Atropine.

Pharmacological control of progression

Editors #PunktZwrotny2050 Sources checked: 09.09.2026 How to read this data

What is this method?

Atropine drops are being investigated as a means of inhibiting the progression of myopia. Concentration, tolerance, age and progression are important; the name of the substance is not the name of the product.

Mechanism and idea

It is a muscarinic receptor antagonist. The clinical effect on progression is not limited to merely relaxing accommodation; the mechanisms by which eye growth is regulated remain under investigation.

How has the evidence developed?

From Bedrossian's early work, through ATOM and ATOM2, to studies of low LAMP concentrations. Each step changed the question: from whether the effect existed, to the selection of concentration, tolerability, and maintenance of the effect after discontinuation.

Go to full timeline

Key randomized trials

2006RCTSingapore

Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia

ATOM showed slower refractive progression and ocular axis increase with atropine 1% than with placebo.

One randomly selected eye was treated; Asian population. We do not transfer the effects and effectiveness of this concentration directly to low concentrations.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions
2012RCTSingapore

Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2)

ATOM2 compared the atropine concentrations of 0,5%, 0,1% and 0,01%; lower concentrations had a milder visual symptom profile.

No parallel placebo arm. The historical placebo with ATOM1 is not an equivalent random comparator.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions
2019RCTHong Kong

Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% Atropine Eye Drops in Myopia Control

In LAMP, atropine 0,05% provided greater control of refraction and axis extension than 0,025% and 0,01% in the first year of the study.

The response was concentration dependent; this result does not establish the optimal dose for each child.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions
2023RCTUSA

Low-Dose 0.01% Atropine Eye Drops vs Placebo for Myopia Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial

In the American PEDIG RCT, atropine 0,01% did not slow progression or axis prolongation relative to placebo.

The result relates to the tested concentration, preparation and population. It does not disprove the effects of all concentrations of atropine.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions

Evidence reviews and syntheses

The review is not a substitute for checking a specific intervention. The publication date and query end date may vary.

2025 Review/Consensus Global

IMI-Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression 2025

IMI 2025 organizes optical, pharmacological, environmental and lighting strategies and the state of research on their effects.

Mature technologies and emerging methods have a different evidence base. The inspection is not an individual clinical eligibility assessment of the child.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions

What do longer observations tell us?

ATOM2 post-discontinuation phases show that the end-of-treatment score alone does not describe the entire pathway. Myopia control also requires a post-intervention evaluation plan.

Safety

Pupil dilation, photophobia and difficulty seeing at close range depend, among other things, on: on concentration. Tolerance and course after discontinuation are monitored; concentration and schedule are not selected based on the online table.

Limitations and open questions

LAMP and American PEDIG gave different results for atropine 0,01%. All concentrations should not be averaged to a single "atropine effectiveness" number. ATOM2 did not have a parallel placebo.

  • How to choose the concentration according to the course of progression and tolerance?
  • How to maintain benefit and monitor rebound?
  • In which populations can the result of a given formulation be reproduced?

When is it considered?

According to the ESO/IMI framework, it may be considered in children with progressive myopia after individual risk assessment. The availability and status of a specific preparation should be checked in the current product documentation.

What should be monitored?

  • Refraction in the appropriate protocol and eye axis length
  • Pupil, accommodation, light tolerance and near vision
  • Regularity of use and progression after changing or ending treatment

This is a framework for a conversation with a specialist, not an individual treatment plan.

References for this chapter

1971Historical studyUSA

The effect of atropine on myopia

Bedrossian's record from 1971 documents the early stage of research on atropine in myopia.

Verified metadata; no abstract in the register. We do not attribute the numerical effect or the contemporary standard of RCT. This is the oldest verified record for this version of the axis, not a claim of the first ever study.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions
2014Follow-up after RCTSingapore

Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: changes after stopping atropine 0.01%, 0.1% and 0.5%

After discontinuation of atropine in ATOM2, rebound dependent on the previous concentration was observed.

The post-treatment phase concerns participants in a specific study. It does not designate a universal withdrawal pattern.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions
2021Guidelines/consensusEurope

Update and guidance on management of myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in cooperation with International Myopia Institute

ESO and IMI present a framework for the selection of management, prevention and monitoring of myopia progression.

The guidelines require reference to current knowledge, local availability and the specific patient.

Publication, Authors and Restrictions

Availability

Text size
100%
Contrast
Reading
SOURCE RECORD

Source record