What does this source bring?
The RLRL safety review included 20 testing; 1436 participants received therapy. No permanent vision loss was reported in the analyzed corpus.
Median follow-up 9 months, maximum 24. Two descriptions referred to the same patient. The absence of an observed event does not prove zero risk.
CLAIM-RLRL-SAFETYScope of testing and verification
- The role of the record
- Source of the claim
- Population
- Children 3–18 years old; 20 research
- N
- 2380
- Geography
- Globally
- Observation (months)
- 24
- Comparator
- Varied research
- Result
- The RLRL safety review included 20 testing; 1436 participants received therapy. No permanent vision loss was reported in the analyzed corpus.
- Safety
- Afterimages, a description of reversible visual impairment and abnormalities OCT.
- Device/structure
- Not applicable / not determined within the verified range
- Publisher of the publication
- Elsevier BV
- Financing
- Not determined within the proven range; see the declaration in full text.
- Conflicts of interest
- Not determined within the proven range. The absence of confirmation does not mean the absence of conflict.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100124
- PMID
- 39672511
- What was checked
- Bibliographic metadata and abstract in Europe PMC / PubMed; Crossref metadata
- Date of verification
- 2026-09-09
This is the editorial card of the publication. The description does not replace the full text, supplementary data or instructions for a specific device.