What does this source bring?
Follow-up of RLRL showed maintenance of the effect in those continuing and rebound in some people after discontinuation.
Second year without re-randomization; only 11 children continued RLRL, 114 with 199 eligible were analyzed. It does not establish verified tapering.
CLAIM-RLRL-REBOUNDScope of testing and verification
- The role of the record
- Source of the claim
- Population
- Participants after the original RCT RLRL
- N
- 114
- Geography
- China
- Observation (months)
- 24
- Comparator
- Not applicable / no common comparator
- Result
- Follow-up of RLRL showed maintenance of the effect in those continuing and rebound in some people after discontinuation.
- Safety
- This record does not allow estimation of the frequency of rare adverse events.
- Device/structure
- Not applicable / not determined within the verified range
- Publisher of the publication
- Wiley
- Financing
- National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China (Crossref metadata; may not include all forms of support).
- Conflicts of interest
- Not determined within the proven range. The absence of confirmation does not mean the absence of conflict.
- DOI
- 10.1111/ceo.14149
- PMID
- 36054314
- What was checked
- Bibliographic metadata and abstract in Europe PMC / PubMed; Crossref metadata
- Date of verification
- 2026-09-09
This is the editorial card of the publication. The description does not replace the full text, supplementary data or instructions for a specific device.