What does this source bring?
In a retrospective analysis, DIMS + RLRL was associated with greater axis control than either method alone.
Lack of randomization, unequal groups and no monofocal lens group. It does not establish a standard or ranking of all methods.
CLAIM-RLRL-DIMSScope of testing and verification
- The role of the record
- Source of the claim
- Population
- Schoolchildren with myopia; 380 eyes
- N
- 190
- Geography
- China
- Observation (months)
- 10
- Comparator
- DIMS or RLRL separately
- Result
- In a retrospective analysis, DIMS + RLRL was associated with greater axis control than either method alone.
- Safety
- This record does not allow estimation of the frequency of rare adverse events.
- Device/structure
- Not applicable / not determined within the verified range
- Publisher of the publication
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Financing
- Not determined within the proven range; see the declaration in full text.
- Conflicts of interest
- Not determined within the proven range. The absence of confirmation does not mean the absence of conflict.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-024-81363-5
- PMID
- 39893182
- What was checked
- Bibliographic metadata and abstract in Europe PMC / PubMed
- Date of verification
- 2026-09-09
This is the editorial card of the publication. The description does not replace the full text, supplementary data or instructions for a specific device.