What does this source bring?
In BLINK, soft lenses with high addition + 2,50 D inhibited progression more strongly than the tested single vision and medium addition lenses.
The result relates to the tested structure and addition; is not a comparison to the MiSight disposable lens.
CLAIM-BLINKScope of testing and verification
- The role of the record
- Source of the claim
- Population
- Children 7–11 years in the USA
- N
- 294
- Geography
- USA
- Observation (months)
- 36
- Comparator
- Addition + 1,50 D and single vision lenses
- Result
- In BLINK, soft lenses with high addition + 2,50 D inhibited progression more strongly than the tested single vision and medium addition lenses.
- Safety
- This record does not allow estimation of the frequency of rare adverse events.
- Device/structure
- Not applicable / not determined within the verified range
- Publisher of the publication
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Financing
- Not determined within the proven range; see the declaration in full text.
- Conflicts of interest
- Not determined within the proven range. The absence of confirmation does not mean the absence of conflict.
- DOI
- 10.1001 /cavity. 2020.10834
- PMID
- 32780139
- What was checked
- Bibliographic metadata and abstract in Europe PMC / PubMed; Crossref metadata
- Date of verification
- 2026-09-09
This is the editorial card of the publication. The description does not replace the full text, supplementary data or instructions for a specific device.